Environmental ScienceLinguisticsGeneral Philosophy of ScienceHistory of Philosophy |
Waiting for the Anthropocene Are we living in a new geological epoch? Maybe. Maybe not. But we definitely shouldn't go around confidently saying we are. Buzzwords aren't the solution to complex environmental and social problems. Save the Planet: Eliminate Biodiversity Biodiversity is a scientifically elusive entity. Worse, it misrepresents what we actually value in nature. Buzzwords aren't the solution to complex environmental and social problems. Biodiversity Eliminativism Sometimes, when people don't get it the first time, you have to simplify the argument so they can get it the second time. In this one I come down hard on the gap between what biodiversity represents and what we actually value in nature. Biodiversity is a chimera, and chimeras aren't real Sometimes, when people don't get it the first or second time, you have to clarify the argument so they can get it the third time. In this one I explain, with constant reference to ecological examples, why biodiversity isn't a real entity or property you can find in the world. Bub What is language? This simple question can get linguists and philosophers of language really riled up. This paper is my attempt to get everyone to play nice. I highlight some ground rules that, if followed, allow everyone to have their own answer to the question. Ambiguity in cooperative signaling Why are biological signaling systems (including language) so ambiguous? Because organisms are lazy. Why not all evidence is scientific evidence Have you ever wondered why "I feel it in my gut!" or "My grandparents always said..." aren't permissible forms of evidence in science, even though your gut and your grandparents are usually right? I wrote this paper so you don't have to wonder anymore. Three short commentaries on cultural evolution 1 2 3 Mining History In which I recount the early history of Nevada's richest silver mine. The moral of the story: there should be no philosophical canon. "Two opposite things placed near each other are the better discerned": Philosophical readings of Cavendish's literary output Historians of philosophy tend to dismiss Cavendish's plays and novel as not worth our attention because they don't look like philosophy. That's sexist! When male philosophers write in fictional genres, we take them seriously. Moreover, there's some good stuff in Cavendish's fiction. You can't honestly tell me you're not interested in a play called "The Convent of Pleasure" or a sci-fi novel called "Blazing World." |